Challenges and use of virtual tools in teamwork
Keywords:
teamwork, virtual tools, virtual teamAbstract
Purpose of the article There have been many studies focusing on teamwork. However, the digital transformation has caused new challenges in this field. Thus, the aim of the article is to provide insight into the most significant challenges in virtual teamwork and to identify the used and known virtual tools.
Methodology/methods This study adopted a quantitative approach by means of questionnaire administered online. The final sample consisted of 622 respondents from two universities from Poland and Romania. The survey was conducted on January 2019. Students from several classes from the bachelor and the master programs of all faculties of both universities were approached to respond to a survey.
Scientific aim The aim of the survey was to diagnose the students’ experience in virtual teamwork, their challenges of working in this type of teams, and knowing and using of tools for virtual teamwork.
Findings The research results shows that almost half of the students (48,1 percent) have experience in virtual teamwork. Their experience is mainly regarding with preparing a project or a presentation for classes. However, the most used tools are these which are the most popular: messengers, mobile phone, social media like Facebook, e-mail and tool for creating folders and holding files like Google drive. Thus, one of the dimensions of challenges of work in virtual teams is insufficient knowledge of IT tools by team members and technology difficulties (eg. software, computer, internet access).
Conclusions In the context of growing needs in this area, it seems important to support to acquire teamwork skills. It seems that the students learn to use virtual tools by the way doing of something for classes. Thus, the classes should teach students how to use of virtual tools to a greater extent, especially that some of the tools are well known but not used. Organizations might offer internships to enable students to develop skills in using specific virtual tools.
References
Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., Ramirez, R. (2017), Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust, Information & Management, 54(4), 479-490
Bisbe, J., Sivabalan, P. (2017), Management control and trust in virtual settings: A case study of a virtual new product development team, Management Accounting Research, 37, 12–29
Bosch-Sijtsema, P.M., Haapamäki, J. (2014), Perceived enablers of 3D virtual environments for virtual team learning and innovation, Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 395-401
Bouwman, H., Van Den Hooff, B., Van De Wijngaert, L., Van Dijk, J. (2008), Information and Communication Technology in Organizations, London: Sage Publications
Cascio, W. (2000), Managing a virtual workplace, The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 81-90
Cascio, W. F., Shurygailo, S. (2003), E-Leadership and Virtual Teams, Organizational Dynamics, 31, 362–367
Cramton, C. (2001), The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in dispersed collaboration, Organiza-tion Science, 12 (3), 346-371
Dabbish, L., Kraut, R. (2008), Awareness displays and social motivations for coordinating communication, In-formation Systems Reseach, 19 (2), 221-238
Dulebohn, J.H., Hoch, J.E. (2017), Virtual teams in organizations, Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 569-574
Espinosa, J.A., Slaughter, S.A., Kraut, R.E., Herbsleb, J.D. (2007), Familiarity, complexity, and team perfor-mance in geographically distributed software development, Organization Science, 18 (4), 613-630
Eubanks, D.L., Palanski, M., Olabisi, J., Joinson, A., Dove, J (2016), Team dynamics in virtual, partially distrib-uted teams: Optimal role fulfillment, Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 556-568
Finholt, T., Sproull, L.S. (1990), Electronic groups at work, Organization Science, 1, 41-64
Fiol, C.M., O’Conner, E.J. (2005), Identification in face-to-face, hybrid and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions, Organization Science, 16, 19-32
Geister, S., Konradt, U., Hertel, G. (2006), Effects of process feedback on motivation: satisfaction and perfor-mance in virtual teams, Small Group Research, 37, 459-489
Gibson, C.B., Cohen, S.G. (editors) (2003), Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, San Francisco: Wiley
Großer, B., Baumöl, U. (2017), Why virtual teams work - State of the art, Procedia Computer Science, 121, 297-305
Hertel, G., Konradt, U., Orlikowski, B. (2004), Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task inter-dependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 1-28
Hoch, J.E., Kozlowski, S.W.J. (2014), Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared leadership, Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 390-403
Hunsaker, P.L., Hunsaker J.S. (2008), Virtual teams: a leadeŕs guide, Team Performance Management, 14 (1/2), 86-99
Jarvempaa, S. L., Tanriverdi, H. (2003), Leading virtual Knowledge Networks, Organizational Dynamics, 31, 403–412
Jarvenpaa, S., Leidner, D. (1999), Communication and trust in global virtual teams, Organization Science, 10 (6), 791-815
Kiesler, S. Cummings, J.N. (editors) (2002), What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research, Distributed Work, Boston: MIT Press
Klitmøller, A., Lauring, J. (2013), When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultural differ-ence and language commonality, Journal of World Business, 48(3), 398-406
Laitinen, K., Valo, M. (2018), Meanings of communication technology in virtual team meetings: Framing tech-nology-related interaction, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 111, 12-22
Lee-Kelley, L., Sankey, T. (2008), Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: a case study, In-ternational Journal of Project Management, 26, 51-62
Lee-Kelley, L., Sankey, T. (2008), Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study, International Journal of Project Management, 26, 51–62
Malhotra, A. Majchrzak, A. (2014), Enhancing performance of geographically distributed teams through targeted use of information and communication technologies, Human Relations; Studies Towards the Inte-gration of the Social Sciences, 67 (4), 389-411
Martins, L.L. Gilson, L.L., Maynard, M.T. (2004), Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805-835
Matwiejczuk W., Samul J. (2016), Teamwork measures and organizational performance: some empirical obser-vation, 21th International Scientific Conference: Economics and Management ICEM’2016, s. 57-61
Nedelko, Z. (2008), The role and importance of groupware for teamwork. The Business Review, Cambridge, 10(1), 211-218
O'Leary, M.B., Cummings, J.N. (2007), The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams, MIS Quarterly, 31, 433-452
Piccoli, G., Powell, A., Ives B. (2004), Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes and team effective-ness Information, Technology People, 17 (4), 359-379
Pinjani, P., Palvia, P. (2013), Trust and Knowledge Sharing in Diverse Global Virtual Teams, Information & Management, 50, 144-153
Powell, A., Piccoli, G., Ives, B. (2004), Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research, The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 35 (1), 6-36
Schaubroeck, J.M., Yu, A. (2017), When does virtuality help or hinder teams? Core team characteristics as con-tingency factors, Human Resource Management Review, 27, 635–64
Sigala, M., Chalkiti, K. (2015), Knowledge management, social media and employee creativity, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 45, 44-58
Snellman, C.L. (2014), Virtual teams: opportunities and challenges for e-leadersProcedia - Social and Behavior-al Sciences, 110, 1251-1261
Stahl, G., Maznevski, M.L., Voght, A., Jonsen K. (2010), Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research in multicultural work groups, Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 690-709
Wadsworth, M.B., Blanchard, A.L (2015), Influence tactics in virtual teams, Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 386-393
Warkentin, M., Sayeed, L., Hightower, R. (1997), Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system, Decision Sciences, 28, 241-262
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
One of our top priorities and responsibilities is to prevent any illegal or unethical practice. Plagiarism is not tolerated in any form. Through the submission of a manuscript, the author confirms that it is their own original research. The ethical rules are binding for all parties who participate in the conference and are published in the Conference Proceedings. All parties to the editorial process respect the Ethical Rules of Conference.
